Clothing Brand Agents Should Learn To Protect Their Legitimate Rights And Interests.

In recent years, some

Testing water in international brands

However, the above reasons are not enough to explain why international brands choose to abandon agents.

In the dispute of many related brands and agents, it is a deeper experience that the inherent defects of this cooperation mode result in disputes.

The development of the market by agents results in the fact that the market is handed over to the agents, and the supervision of the agents to the agents is mostly reflected in the written contract terms, which are limited by the limited regulatory manpower.

However, for those agents who abide by the terms of the contract and devote themselves to enthusiasm, the unilateral breach of the brand is undoubtedly a great blow.

As Zhao Yunhu, the president of the company, said, "a plan that is being planned, planned and implemented is constantly obstructed, disrupted, interfered and not implemented, which has brought huge losses to the enterprise."

In addition, we should distinguish the degree of default and the different consequences caused by breach of contract, for example, under what circumstances constitute remediable breach of contract, and under what circumstances, the brand can terminate the contract immediately.

In particular, the amount of liquidated damages should be agreed as far as possible in breach of contract terms, because many cases show that agents usually have significant losses when they default, but there is often no way to prove the amount of losses.

Therefore, the agreed liquidated damages will help agents to take the initiative in dispute resolution.

The provisions of the dispute settlement clause should also be given enough attention.

Avoid different dispute resolution methods in agency contract, trademark licensing contract and other related contracts.

Otherwise, it will bring inconvenience to the future dispute settlement.